Supplementary data for the paper 'External Human-Machine Interfaces: Which of 729 Colors Is Best for Signaling ‘Please (Do not) Cross’?' (dataset)

Supplementary data for the paper 'External Human-Machine Interfaces: Which of 729 Colors Is Best for Signaling ‘Please (Do not) Cross’?'

The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future. For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/12948650

Datacite citation style:

Bazilinskyy, Pavlo; Dodou, Dimitra; de Winter, Joost (2022): Supplementary data for the paper 'External Human-Machine Interfaces: Which of 729 Colors Is Best for Signaling ‘Please (Do not) Cross’?'. Version 3. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/12948650.v3

Other citation styles (APA, Harvard, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE) available at Datacite

Dataset

choose version:

version 3 - 2022-05-03 (latest)

version 2 - 2021-03-04 version 1 - 2020-09-15

usage stats

2041

views

citations

210

downloads

categories

keywords

automated driving, color, Crowdsourcing, external human-machine interface (eHMI), intuitiveness

licence

CC0

export as...

RefWorks, BibTeX, Reference Manager, Endnote, DataCite, NLM, DC, CFF

by Pavlo Bazilinskyy

, Dimitra Dodou

, Joost de Winter

Supplementary data for the paper Bazilinskyy, P., Dodou, D., & De Winter, J. C. F. (2020). External Human-Machine Interfaces: Which of 729 colors is best for signaling ‘Please (do not) cross’? IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC). Toronto, ON, Canada.

history