Data underlying the publication: A holistic look at creativity: Evaluating pupils’ creative design ideation and prototypes through comparative judgment
DOI: 10.4121/d01d34ea-45a1-487e-b822-8578a0af3efe
Datacite citation style
Dataset
This study investigates how 20 industrial design students used the method of comparative judgment to holistically assess design ideas and prototypes produced by 201 pupils aged 10 to 14 in the Netherlands. This dataset includes (1) the codebook used to code the comments generated by industrial design students (acting as judges) during the process of comparative judgment, using the platform of No More Marking, (2) judges’ decision data about pupils’ design ideation, design prototype, and design by types—obtained from No More Marking, (3) the parameter values and rankings of portfolios (design ideation, design prototype, design by types), and judge misfit data obtained from the Adaptive Comparative Judgement App (https://jeffbuckley1992.shinyapps.io/comparative_judgement/), (4) code examination and inter-rater reliability data.
History
- 2025-08-27 first online, published, posted
Publisher
4TU.ResearchDataFormat
.xlsx, .docx, .pdfAssociated peer-reviewed publication
A holistic look at creativity: Evaluating pupils’ creative design ideation and prototypes through comparative judgmentFunding
- Spatial thinking in STEM learning: Training a new generation of researchers to increase enrolment and gender balance in STEM learning by addressing deficits in spatial ability among children in Europe (grant code 956124)
Organizations
TU Delft, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Science & Engineering Education group;Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, Faculty of Engineering and Technology
DATA
Files (11)
- 4,019 bytesMD5:
cc49c0be0a2509ff2d4d6a5f125708ae
README.txt - 16,334 bytesMD5:
36c40fb3021bb0a914272cdcacc7dce1
30 ideation comments for inter-rater check.docx - 17,908 bytesMD5:
00da4371ad3e680c2084e7f6858b7ba7
30 prototype comments for inter-rater check.docx - 216,654 bytesMD5:
c4a56713ab5e05e241e676eebb710d64
Codebook—Judges’ comments on pupils’ design ideation & design prototypes.pdf - 47,630 bytesMD5:
108a11c766542e3792938d2970b9e390
decision_data_design types.xlsx - 52,933 bytesMD5:
485137bd24775b13f26b06af8f44091a
decision_data_ideation.xlsx - 53,809 bytesMD5:
f41c83eb2b78a5158fb001396d9b5baf
decision_data_prototype.xlsx - 14,513 bytesMD5:
5960ae4dfa4c36d77a2ab548581ca396
Inter-rater reliability.xlsx - 7,016 bytesMD5:
980f4742c71af5c2dbe74eb51d157ef1
portfolio_results_design type.xlsx - 24,072 bytesMD5:
fc12acb85c5d64841fa9649e4d361f02
portfolio_results_ideation.xlsx - 24,098 bytesMD5:
2999d54a57884e22eef021fa16536d78
portfolio_results_prototype.xlsx -
download all files (zip)
478,986 bytes unzipped