Supplementary data for the paper 'What makes a good driver on public roads and race tracks? An interview study'
doi: 10.4121/14483220
Future vehicles may drive automatically in a human-like manner or contain systems that monitor human driving ability. Algorithms of these systems must have knowledge of criteria of good and safe driving behavior with regard to different driving styles. In the current study, interviews were conducted with 30 drivers, including driving instructors, engineering, and race drivers. The participants were asked to describe good driving on public roads and race tracks, and in some questions were supported with video material. The results were interpreted with the help of Endsley’s model of situation awareness. The interviews showed that there were clear differences between what was considered good driving on the race track and good driving on the public road, where for the former, the driver must touch the limit of the vehicle, whereas, for the latter, the limit should be avoided. However, in both cases, a good driver was characterized by self-confidence, lack of stress, and not being aggressive. Furthermore, it was mentioned that the driver’s posture and viewing behavior are essential components of good driving, which affect the driver’s prediction of events and execution of maneuvers. The implications of our findings for the development of automation technology are discussed. In particular, we see potential in driver posture estimation and argue that automated vehicles excel in perception but may have difficulty making predictions.
- 2021-05-19 first online, published, posted
Department of Connectivity, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG, Germany
DATA
- 1,749 bytesMD5:
45ee30020b84be40b6f05b5e2c3fea04
readme.txt - 2,263,024 bytesMD5:
ac7168a6794df15d836905f0dcc6b31e
Supplementary material.zip -
download all files (zip)
2,264,773 bytes unzipped