Supplementary data for the paper: Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess

doi: 10.4121/14134874.v2
The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future. For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/14134874
Datacite citation style:
de Winter, Joost; S.M. (Sebastiaan) Petermeijer; Kooijman, L. (Lars); Dodou, Dimitra (2021): Supplementary data for the paper: Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess. Version 2. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset.
Other citation styles (APA, Harvard, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE) available at Datacite
choose version:
version 2 - 2021-04-14 (latest)
version 1 - 2021-04-12
Delft University of Technology logo
usage stats
cc-0.png logo CC0

Several papers by Eckhard Hess from the 1960s and 1970s report that the pupils dilate or constrict according to the interest value, arousing content, or mental demands of visual stimuli. However, Hess mostly used small sample sizes and undocumented luminance control. In a first experiment (N = 182) and a second preregistered experiment (N = 147), we replicated five studies of Hess using modern equipment. Our experiments (1) did not support the hypothesis of gender differences in pupil diameter change with respect to baseline (PC) when viewing stimuli of different interest value, (2) showed that solving more difficult multiplications yields a larger PC in the seconds before providing an answer and a larger maximum PC, but a smaller PC at a fixed time after the onset of the multiplication, (3) did not support the hypothesis that participants’ PC mimics the pupil diameter in a pair of schematic eyes but not in single-eyed or three-eyed stimuli, (4) did not support the hypothesis of gender differences in PC when watching a video of a male trying to escape a mob, and (5) supported the hypothesis that arousing words yield a higher PC than non-arousing words. Although we did not observe consistent gender differences in PC, supplementary analyses showed gender differences in eye movements towards erogenous zones. Furthermore, PC strongly correlated with the luminance of the locations where participants looked. Overall, our replications confirm Hess’s findings that pupils dilate in response to mental demands and stimuli of an arousing nature. Hess’s hypotheses regarding pupil mimicry and gender differences in pupil dilation did not replicate.

  • 2021-04-12 first online
  • 2021-04-14 published, posted
associated peer-reviewed publication
Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess
  • A replication study of ‘pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli’ (Hess & Polt, 1960) (grant code 401.16.083) [more info...] Dutch Research Council
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering


files (15)