FE models related to report "Deciding where to verify the fatigue resistance of an orthotropic steel bridge deck"
doi:10.4121/eaa8ceb3-77cc-452b-b2f2-2796ba33e5ab.v1
The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future.
For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/eaa8ceb3-77cc-452b-b2f2-2796ba33e5ab
doi: 10.4121/eaa8ceb3-77cc-452b-b2f2-2796ba33e5ab
Datacite citation style:
Stellinga, Coen (2023): FE models related to report "Deciding where to verify the fatigue resistance of an orthotropic steel bridge deck". Version 1. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/eaa8ceb3-77cc-452b-b2f2-2796ba33e5ab.v1
Other citation styles (APA, Harvard, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE) available at Datacite
Dataset
FE models related to the master thesis with the name: Deciding where to verify the fatigue resistance of an orthotropic steel bridge deck
This contains a total of 11 different FE model which all model the behaviour of a single bridge.
- 4 models are made of 2D elements and do not contain any weld details. The difference is the mesh refinement applied at the welds at the connection between the trough webs and the deck plate
- 4 models are made of 2D elements and do contain weld details according to the Dutch regulations (ROK 2.0). The weld details are at the point for which the model is made. At this point the maximum stress interval is determined. The different points are point: A, B, 1, 2. The locations of this point can be found in the master thesis these model were generated for. Or, by opening the models and observing the location of the mesh refinement.
- 2 models are made of 1D ellements. They are used to research the difference between the choice of modelling of the cross section of the stiffeners. Either "open" or "closed"
- 1 1D models is used the research the response of the main girders due to the loads applied on them by the cross beams
history
- 2023-04-14 first online, published, posted
publisher
4TU.ResearchData
format
.esa
organizations
TU Delft, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences
DATA
files (12)
- 2,564 bytesMD5:
6c56118cf4a63ab0ccc2bbc674d7743b
README.txt - 59,364,722 bytesMD5:
8dce786ff4453a5fc25be298e645a658
1D_Closed stiffener.esa - 88,081,287 bytesMD5:
c8fa6c22b1d0272b1528170ded9e9c39
1D_Main girder.esa - 60,059,816 bytesMD5:
ca37419babbd6f66329fa4724b9789bf
1D_Open stiffener.esa - 48,577,769 bytesMD5:
a9601281551455f8afbcc65787f539f9
2D_No weld details_Global mesh size 0.4 _No local mesh refinement.esa - 40,948,992 bytesMD5:
8d90d5534ba329e435ac282b9a91e8d1
2D_No weld details_Global mesh size 0.4_Local mesh refinement 0.05.esa - 303,589,471 bytesMD5:
13a068ee06bf1feeaaa7054129a244d3
2D_No weld details_Global mesh size 0.4_Local mesh refinement 0.1.esa - 146,106,796 bytesMD5:
e9796490eee3977ffda22cb09ce40159
2D_No weld details_Global mesh size 0.4_Local mesh refinement 0.2.esa - 117,398,991 bytesMD5:
a20408b80522564c369329c729d6a295
2D_With weld details_Point 1_Both trough webs.esa - 2,014,567 bytesMD5:
0c0a673309636b9fb0b717a51b52bd87
2D_With weld details_Point 2_Both trough webs.esa - 535,211,254 bytesMD5:
f9548c49a31885939a3f1cfbc28658da
2D_With weld details_Point A_Both trough webs.esa - 70,264,117 bytesMD5:
56b7dae912f85096060f0d63157a2b38
2D_With weld details_Point B_Right rough web.esa -
download all files (zip)
1,471,620,346 bytes unzipped