Data underlying the publication: Fitts' List Revisited: An Empirical Study on Function Allocation in a Two-Agent Physical Human-Robot Collaborative Position/Force Task
DOI: 10.4121/d55393f4-f6b6-4076-86c1-7bf351f16787
Datacite citation style
Dataset
This dataset accompanies the IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters publication "Fitts' List Revisited: An Empirical Study on Function Allocation in a Two-Agent Physical Human-Robot Collaborative Position/Force Task" (Mol et al., 2025). For a more detailed overview of the experimental methods, the reader is referred to this publication. What follows is a summary.
Study Overview: This study empirically investigates function allocation principles in physical Human-Robot Collaboration (pHRC) by testing whether Fitts' classical "MABA-MABA" framework applies to position/force control tasks in the context of pHRC. Twenty-six participants (N=26, ages 22-42, 4 female, 22 male) completed an abstract blending task under four experimental conditions in a within-subject design.
Experimental Conditions:
- HH: Human controls both position and force (manual baseline)
- HR: Human controls position, robot controls force
- RH: Robot controls position, human controls force
- RR: Robot controls both position and force (supervisory condition)
Methods: Participants used a 7-DOF KUKA LBR iiwa 14 R820 robot equipped with a tool to remove simulated damage from a surface displayed on a horizontal monitor. The monitor surface was connected to a 6-DOF SCHUNK FTN-Delta SI-330-30 Force/Torque sensor to measure interaction forces. Each participant completed a familiarization and 5 trials per condition (4 + 20 trials total), with condition order counterbalanced using a Balanced Latin Square design. After each condition, participants completed three questionnaires: Van der Laan System Acceptance Scale, NASA-TLX Workload Assessment, and the newly developed Agentic Collaboration and Engagement Scale (ACES).
Data Structure: The dataset contains:
- Raw sensor and robot data (ROS bag files): Organized in numbered folders (1-26) corresponding to each participant. Each bag file is named with timestamp, condition code (HH/HR/RH/RR), and trial number (_0 through _5, _0 being the familiarization).
- Participant_order.xlsx: Documents the counterbalanced presentation order of conditions for each participant.
- Impact_of_roles_in_HRC.xlsx: Contains all subjective questionnaire responses (Van der Laan, NASA-TLX, ACES) collected after each condition block for all participants.
Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Delft University of Technology Human Research Ethics Committee.
All participants:
- Were physically healthy adults between the ages of 18-67 (working age)
- Provided written informed consent prior to participation
- Were informed they could withdraw at any time without consequence
Funding: This work was supported by the BrightSky project, funded by the R&D Mobiliteitsfonds from the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO) and commissioned by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy.
History
- 2025-11-17 first online, published, posted
Publisher
4TU.ResearchDataFormat
ROS bag/.bag, spreadsheet/.xlsxAssociated peer-reviewed publication
Fitts' List Revisited: An Empirical Study on Function Allocation in a Two-Agent Physical Human-Robot Collaborative Position/Force TaskReferences
Funding
- BrightSky [more info...] Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO)
Organizations
TU Delft, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Cognitive RoboticsDATA
Files (2)
- 12,434 bytesMD5:
577f6b7e017a7f73f466d715b2e1043bREADME.md - 7,167,160,723 bytesMD5:
a1b2b863a2c3673be8296c19a2463e1adata.zip -
download all files (zip)
7,167,173,157 bytes unzipped





