Data presented in the paper: To Plant or Not to Plant: When can Planting Facilitate Mangrove Restoration?
doi:10.4121/17927198.v1
The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future.
For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/17927198
doi: 10.4121/17927198
Datacite citation style:
van Bijsterveldt, Celine; A.O. (Adolphe) Debrot; Bouma, T.J. (Tjeerd); Moch B. Maulana; R. (Rudhi) Pribadi et. al. (2022): Data presented in the paper: To Plant or Not to Plant: When can Planting Facilitate Mangrove Restoration?. Version 1. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/17927198.v1
Other citation styles (APA, Harvard, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE) available at Datacite
Dataset
usage stats
1663
views
1933
downloads
categories
geolocation
Demak district, Central Java, Indonesia
lat (N): -06°53'14.20"
lon (E): 110°30'27.15"
time coverage
2005-2020
licence
CC BY 4.0
We studied the natural and assisted processes of mangrove expansion in Demak Regency, Indonesia. We studied expansion in both landward direction (i.e. the aquaculture pond zone) and seaward direction (i.e. the coastal zone) from the current coastline in the project area (the old coastal road). The pond zone in the study area is characterized by active traditional aquaculture ponds, and drowning abandoned aquaculture ponds towards the coast. The coastal zone in the study is defined as the area ranging from MHW to MLW (the maximum depth at which the EMR-dams are placed), which ranges roughly 0 to 600 meters from the shoreline. In order to shed light on best practices for mangrove recovery, we aimed to answer four research questions: : 1) how has mangrove
expansion occurred in seaward and landward direction in the past, mainly
through planting or mainly through natural expansion?; 2) Can hydrological EMR
measures (e.g. sluice gate management) induce natural mangrove recovery in the
pond zone (i.e. would enough propagules be available at landward sites if
hydrological connectivity to target ponds was increased)?; 3) Can wave-reducing and sediment-trapping
measures (EMR-dams) induce natural mangrove recovery at challenging sites in
the coastal zone by increasing the chances of a) new seedling establishment or
b) survival of established seedlings? and; 4) Can mangrove planting in
combination with EMR-dams accelerate mangrove recovery at challenging coastal
sites?
We addressed research questions 1-4 in the manuscript, using the following correspondingly numbered methods. 1) GIS monitoring of natural and planted mangrove vegetation in the coastal zone and pond zone using time series of satellite images (Q1_GIS_data & Q1_forest_structure). 2) A year-round propagule monitoring campaign seawards and landwards of the old coastal road (Q2_EMR-hydrology_propagules) to assess the potential for natural mangrove colonization in the active pond zone if maximal EMR-hydrology would be applied. 3) A field experiment at multiple coastal sites with different wave exposure conditions to understand the effect of EMR-dams on mangrove recruitment and seedling survival (Q3_EMR-dams_natural_seedling_establishment_mon & Q3_EMR-dams_seedling_survival_exp). Finally, 4) a field experiment to study the effect of mangrove planting in combination with EMR-dams on seedling growth and survival (Q4_EMR-and-planting)
We addressed research questions 1-4 in the manuscript, using the following correspondingly numbered methods. 1) GIS monitoring of natural and planted mangrove vegetation in the coastal zone and pond zone using time series of satellite images (Q1_GIS_data & Q1_forest_structure). 2) A year-round propagule monitoring campaign seawards and landwards of the old coastal road (Q2_EMR-hydrology_propagules) to assess the potential for natural mangrove colonization in the active pond zone if maximal EMR-hydrology would be applied. 3) A field experiment at multiple coastal sites with different wave exposure conditions to understand the effect of EMR-dams on mangrove recruitment and seedling survival (Q3_EMR-dams_natural_seedling_establishment_mon & Q3_EMR-dams_seedling_survival_exp). Finally, 4) a field experiment to study the effect of mangrove planting in combination with EMR-dams on seedling growth and survival (Q4_EMR-and-planting)
history
- 2022-02-08 first online, published, posted
publisher
4TU.ResearchData
format
shapefiles and csv datafiles
associated peer-reviewed publication
To plant or not to plant: When can planting facilitate mangrove restoration?
funding
- This work was part of the BioManCo project with project number 14753, which is (partly) financed by NWO Domain Applied and Engineering Sciences, and Engineering Sciences, and co-financed by Boskalis Dredging and Marine experts, Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractors bv, Deltares, Witteveen+Bos and Wetlands International. The BioManCO project is a collaboration between TU Delft, NIOZ and UNDIP and makes use of the framework set up by Building with Nature Indonesia, a program by Ecoshape, Wetlands International, the Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF), the Indonesian Ministry of Public Works and Housing (PU) and other partners.The Netherlands Sustainable Water Fund provided partial funding for this work through project number FDW14R14. Co-funding to cover the participation by WMR staff was provided by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality through grant KB 36 #4318300114 and through WMR project # 4311500013.
organizations
Department of Estuarine and Delta Studies, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ)Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University
Wageningen Marine Research, Wageningen University and Research
Marine and Animal Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research
Witteveen + Bos
Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Diponegoro University
Unit for Marine and Coastal Systems, Deltares
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology
DATA
files (21)
- 939 bytesMD5:
4e63cc3e69b321a97c651fa34188c54b
README_Q1_forest_structure_and_validation_locations.txt - 1,258 bytesMD5:
50e723c169dc11222f74d3b6b229c219
README_Q1_GIS_data_and_polygons.txt - 687 bytesMD5:
892804333b695e4fd74e5c5ec8710385
README_Q2_EMR-hydrology_propagules.txt - 926 bytesMD5:
b8b2f38b476c60d720cec0e923c22188
README_Q3_EMR-dams_natural_seedling_establishment_mon.txt - 877 bytesMD5:
57aea1e1e39cfd96b3735cf9f230829f
README_Q3_EMR-dams_seedling_survival_exp.txt - 1,387 bytesMD5:
f8bb4dc34c6fdf6c938c1fd60a0a151f
README_Q4_EMR-and-planting.txt - 64,100 bytesMD5:
9bf2cebed9c36c9937c8ec2b093e7c95
2005_wgs84.shp - 119,632 bytesMD5:
43dcf0513783e52747ec37d511bf2fb0
2010_wgs84.shp - 44,572 bytesMD5:
f98766b628403578a547ace935882819
2013_wgs84.shp - 67,324 bytesMD5:
95a7a4b7a66c7b02957e89217853eebe
2014_wgs84.shp - 84,116 bytesMD5:
d17c5532268e6d3767e5e962fcb045c7
2015_wgs84.shp - 136,252 bytesMD5:
65b4b1de0f45b8bc1b29da42f0eb1832
2016_wgs84.shp - 89,964 bytesMD5:
199a4ead3cd94184369fa33aa4b1d438
2017_wgs84.shp - 73,264 bytesMD5:
4a9c71194198bb593a995782440f1ea4
2018_wgs84.shp - 34,692 bytesMD5:
70748bd00f26d0d2d424c36158dcde68
Q1_forest_structure.csv - 208,979 bytesMD5:
fa192bd6c77b3b6ad6c3172ecc852cc3
Q1_GIS_data.csv - 209,326 bytesMD5:
0ff1f10768342ba6cb6cbf90feec0b61
Q2_EMR-hydrology_propagules.csv - 34,151 bytesMD5:
256f17d372ca2ad6fab4247e0b2421a5
Q3_EMR-dams_natural_seedling_establishment_mon.csv - 47,266 bytesMD5:
c1a6dcf03da60ba7671f0f120eed8ee7
Q3_EMR-dams_seedling_survival_exp.csv - 121,084 bytesMD5:
13cb87af0a775da5d4ef51ea0eeb51f0
Q4_EMR-and-planting.csv - 828 bytesMD5:
9d0ab800690487e5087165ddfba11865
validation_locations_2018.shp -
download all files (zip)
1,341,624 bytes unzipped