*** Optimizing multi-resolution topographic indicator combinations for debris flow 
susceptibility assessment based on factorial experiments and UMAP analysis ***

Authors: Si Alu, Quan, Enliang Guo, Yongfang Wang, Jiquan Zhang
College of Tourism, Inner Mongolia Normal University
Corresponding author: Si Alu
Contact Information:
alusi007@imnu.edu.com

Inner Mongolia Normal University - College of Tourism
P.O. Box 10022
Hohhot
China


***General Introduction***
This dataset contains four supplemental material data collected	 during optimizing 
multi-resolution topographic indicator combinations reserach.
As part of Si Alu's research project, it is being made public both to act as 
supplementary data for publications and in order for other researchers to use this 
data in their own work.


***Purpose of the test campaign***

The purpose of these experiments was to analyzed the influence of pixel resolutions 
on susceptibility assessment performance, and aimed to identify the optimal pixel 
resolution combination for topographic indicators.


***Description of the data in this data set***
This dataset contains four supplemental material data.

Supplemental material 1 is Performance Evaluation Results of Preliminary Analysis Phase.
This supplemental material includes seven types of performance evaluation indices for debris flow
 susceptibility results corresponding to each treatment combination within the 73 indicator 
screening groups, along with their mean values and standard deviations.
Groups 1 through 73 represent distinct indicator screening groups. For details, 
refer to Appendix 1 in the paper "Optimizing multi-resolution topographic indicator 
combinations for debris flow susceptibility assessment based on factorial experiments and 
UMAP analysis."

Supplemental material 2 is Performance Evaluation Results of Detailed Analysis Phase.
This supplemental material includes seven performance evaluation indices corresponding 
to each treatment combination after susceptibility prediction during the detailed analysis
phase for the three models.

Supplementary Material 3 contains the probability 1 and probability 2 results,
corresponding to each treatment combination during factorial experiments 
based on Table 5.

Supplementary Material 4 contains the probability 1 and probability 2 results,
corresponding to each treatment combination when conducting partial factorial
experiments based on 2 to 5 indicators.
