This is a set of Matlab .fig files corresponding to the figures in the paper 'Experimental study on binary solids drying in a vibro-fluidized bed'.

The dataset consists of the following .fig files whereof a short description is given below:

Figure 2: Segregation index based on the average height of the small and large-sized solids for the static fluidized bed experiment. The bed starts to segregate based on size and after 95 s, the size-based segregation is reduced and the bed becomes better mixed.
Figure 4 A and B: Mean particle temperature and standard deviation over time for the static fluidized bed case. The initial temperature increase is caused by the hot initial column conditions. A wet-bulb drying regime is observed, whereafter an increase in mean particle temperature is noted, indicating the start of the internally limited drying regime.
Figure 7 A and B: Segregation index based on the average height of the small and large-sized solids for the Γ = 0.5 cases. Due to the mechanical vibration, the bed is less segregated based on size in the Az = 12.5 mm, fz = 3.15 Hz and Az = 6.25 mm, fz = 4.46 Hz experiments, while a larger segregation rate compared to the static fluidized bed is found in the Az = 3.13 mm, fz = 6.30 Hz and Az = 1.56 mm, fz = 8.92 Hz cases.
Figure 8 A, B, C and D: Particle temperature standard deviation over time for the Γ = 0.5 cases. An increasing vibration amplitude results in larger differences between the temporal standard deviation.
Figure 11 A and B: Segregation index based on the average height of the small and large-sized solids for the Γ = 1 and 1.5 cases. Due to the added mechanical vibration, the bed is well-mixed.
Figure 12 A and B: Average solids volume fraction at 90-110 s versus the axial position for the static fluidized bed, Γ = 1 and 1.5 cases. Due to the added mechanical vibration, the bubble volume fraction is decreased.
Figure 13 A, B and C: Standard deviation over time for the Γ = 1 cases. An increasing vibration amplitude results in larger differences between the temporal standard deviation.
Figure 14 A, B, C and D: Standard deviation over time for the Γ = 1.5 cases. An increasing vibration amplitude results in larger differences between the temporal standard deviation.