Figure 7. Comparison between the permeating water flux through the pristine membrane and that through the etalon membranes as a function 
of pressure at different pH and temperature ranges.
Table IV. Permeance of the MEM under different conditions and percentage decrease in the MEM’s permeance compared to that of the pristine membrane. 
Figure 9. Logarithmic plot of permeance as a function of pressure for the pristine and etalon membranes under different pH conditions.
Figure S1, S4, S7. The logarithmic plot of flux as a function of pressure for pristine and microgel based etalon membranes.
Figure S3, S6. Comparison between the pristine membrane and the microgel based etalon membranes (A) for different glucose
concentrations at 22 and 37 o C in low (I) and high (II) pressures at pH 9.3 and pH 6.5. 
Table S2, S3. Permeance of the studied membranes in different conditions in pH 9.3 and pH 6.5 and percentage difference of microgel-based
etalon membranes’ permeance from that of pristine membrane.

Permeability experiments are performed with water, aqueous HCl, NaOH and glucose solutions in different temperatures. The txt files 
provide raw data of the pressure and the flow rate of the liquid permeating through the membrane. In the excel files the raw data are 
provided and a sheet where the flux, permeability, permeance are calculated.