fundamental rights consideration
    also applies to what government does anyway when carrying out a work process
    balancing different rights
eliminate blind spots
    might translate to requirements
multiple levels
    1. determine national legal space
    2. update local ordinance -- adds accountability and transparency
    3. project or application level -- determine ``how'', this is the level where citizen participation can add value
example: participation council (Participatieraad) consultation on use of AI by Work Participation and Income (WPI) for evaluation of assistance benefit applications
    negative advice
    P7 thinks they did not entirely get it
use pilots to get clarity on what steps are necessary to justify a thing
participatory sessions where requirements are developed with citizens
department heads or managers are ``first line of defense'' for when things go wrong so they need to really understand what is happening
developers need to manage models for some time
proper documentation to enable handover
human-in-the-loop -- will always be these case with these kinds of applications because supervision and enforcement are separate roles
human controller at supervision stage should be able to make service management software notification if they detect erroneous system behavior
service software is integrated with development environment
what is not present yet is a similar integration for complaints from citizens
development team is not line management that carries out this work process, so citizen questions should not be directed at them
organization lacks roles that concern a translation of legislation and regulations into IT systems
big question is still how citizen participation can be made part of development process
make it traceable who the requirements setter is and whether requirements have actually been complied with
setting up an internal auditing team
we need mechanisms that make it inevitable that certain requirements are affected (they have enough analysis and assessment methods)
    saving emails
    keeping a log that shows certain measures are indeed enforced (such as deleting data)
record variables that significantly impact a model prediction in client file
    if it receives a ruling from the administrative court it is indirectly also about the operation of that model
    ``If a judge is like, well, given your administrative powers and also a bit of discretionary power, you have been sufficiently verifiable and transparent in what you do and it is a good consideration that you have made in how you exercise your power [...].''
