title,body,link,tags,view_count,is_answered,score,answer_count
Why isn&#39;t IE11 providing me with a stack trace?,"<p>I'm running a VM with Windows 7 to run IE11 for browser compatibility testing.</p>

<p>I'm encoutering IE11 specific errors, but none of them seem to have stack traces, I'm just getting generic errors which is making it extremely difficult to diagnose the issue. See image:</p>

<p><a href=""https://i.stack.imgur.com/FfW31.png"" rel=""nofollow noreferrer""><img src=""https://i.stack.imgur.com/FfW31.png"" alt=""IE11 with no stack trace""></a></p>

<p>Any ideas?</p>
",https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52778972/why-isnt-ie11-providing-me-with-a-stack-trace,"['javascript', 'internet-explorer', 'cross-browser', 'internet-explorer-11', 'stack-trace']",427,FALSE,0,0
Is testing on OpenShift Container Platform (OCP) equivalent to testing on Openshift Origin from a kubernetes standpoint?,"<p><em>This applications which are programmed to use the kubernetes API.</em></p>

<p>Should we assume that openshift container platform, from a kubernetes standpoint, matches all the standards that openshift origin (and kubernetes) does?</p>

<p><em>Background</em></p>

<p>Compatibility testing cloud native apps that are shipped can include a large matrix.  It seems that, as a baseline, if OCP is meant to be a pure kubernetes distribution, with add ons, then testing against it is trivial, so long as you are only using core kubernetes features.</p>

<p>Alternatively, if shipping an app with support on OCP means you must test OCP, that would to me imply that (1) the app uses OCP functionality or (2) the app uses kube functionality which may not work correctly in OCP, which should be a considered a bug.</p>
",https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52108513/is-testing-on-openshift-container-platform-ocp-equivalent-to-testing-on-opensh,"['kubernetes', 'openshift', 'redhat']",285,TRUE,0,1
Avoid MS Access SQL insert bug,"<p>I am converting an Access ADP file to ACCDB in preparation for Access 2016.</p>

<p>It's currently Access 2013 while all the functional testing is done before we move that to Access 2016 for compatibility testing.</p>

<p>I have one form where inserting a new record displays <code>#Deleted</code> after the insert.</p>

<p>I have traced through the profiler that it does 2 <code>sp_executesql</code> calls</p>

<p>One does the insert</p>

<p>The second queries for the new identity column value by using all the column values.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, there are several column values that are <code>NULL</code>, and the text shows it is querying for <code>Field = @P6</code> (where <code>@P6 = NULL</code>) rather than <code>Field IS NULL</code>.</p>

<p>I've checked, and replacing the <code>NULL</code> variable checks with <code>IS NULL</code> does return the correct key value.</p>

<p>Is there a known bug relating to this?
I'm assuming it would be either in Access or ODBC</p>

<p>If so, can someone point me to the appropriate documentation so I can arrange any required upgrades, etc.</p>

<p>ODBC Connection I am using:</p>

<p><code>ODBC;Driver={SQL Server};APP=TEST;SERVER=TEST_SQL;DATABASE=TestDB;Trusted_Connection=Yes;TABLE=dbo.Inspection</code></p>
",https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50794785/avoid-ms-access-sql-insert-bug,"['sql-server', 'ms-access', 'odbc']",106,FALSE,1,0
